, find .
I came across this sum in An Imaginary Tale by Nahin and I was fascinated.
Let and .
Remember Hence, Therefore, and and |
Which means,
Let’s try a few partial sums
Hence,
What happens as ?
Because we know is undefined.
, find .
I came across this sum in An Imaginary Tale by Nahin and I was fascinated.
Let and .
Remember Hence, Therefore, and and |
Which means,
Let’s try a few partial sums
Hence,
What happens as ?
Because we know is undefined.
Filed under Identities, Interesting Mathematics, Puzzles, Sequences, Trigonometry
Remember
(1)
We know that for odd integer multiples of , i.e. , which is for
Hence,
for
We can factorise our expansion
We know
We are going to use De Moivre’s theorem to prove trigonometric identities.
Remember, De Moivre’s Theorem
If , then
Or a shorter version , then
Now, let , find
Remember and
It is the same for
Prove |
We can do something similar with sine.
Hence
Prove |
Let’s find an identity for
And ?
Filed under Complex Numbers, Identities, Trig Identities, Trigonometry
I worked on this question with one of my students (I don’t know where it is from).
Mike leaves the rose bush he was examining and walks 35m in the direction SW towards a pond. From there he walks 70m towards a rotunda. Mike is now 100m from the rose bush. Find the bearing of the rotunda from the pond. |
Let’s try to draw a diagram
Because we don’t the direction Mike walked from the pond, I have drawn a circle with radius 70m centred at the pond.
We know Mike is now 100m from the rose bush. As we don’t know the direction, I have drawn another circle with radius 100m centred at the rose bush. Where the two circles intersect are the possible locations of the rotunda.
Use the cosine rule to find the angle
Using the fact that alternate angles in parallel lines are congruent, we can see
that the bearing from the pond to the rotunda is
It is the same triangle, so
This time the bearing is
Hence, the two possible bearings of the rotunda from the pond are or .
Filed under Bearings, Non-Right Trigonometry, Trigonometry
As I have done a cosine rule proof, I thought I should also do a sine rule proof.
From the above diagram, we can find in two ways.
Set equation 1 equal to equation 2
or
We could have put the altitude of the triangle from vertex A
Following the same process as above
Set equation 3 equal to equation 4.
Now therefore
or
Filed under Non-Right Trigonometry, Right Trigonometry, Trigonometry
From the diagram above
(1)
From the diagram above, we can see
(2)
Substitute equation 2 into equation 1
It can also be handy to have the angle version
Filed under Non-Right Trigonometry, Right Trigonometry, Trigonometry, Uncategorized
One of my year 10 students came with this question from his text book.
Here is my solution.
A pdf version of the solution
Filed under Right Trigonometry, Trigonometry, Uncategorized
This is question 5 from the UK Maths Trust Senior Challenge October 2023.
I have tackled this in three ways; using non-right trig to find the area, Heron’s Law, and the Shoelace Formula.
Use the area of a triangle formula
Use the cosine rule to find cosθ.
Once we have cosθ, we can find sinθ.
Hence the area is,
Use Heron’s law.
Heron’s law is a way of calculating area of a triangle from the lengths of the three sides of the triangle.
This is my preferred method – simple and direct.
Shoelace formula (Gauss’s Area formula)
We need to allocate each of the vertices a co-ordinate.
The co-ordinates are listed in an anti-clockwise direction.
This is probably a bit over the top, but once you get the hang of it, it’s very easy.