Racquel Sanderson

July 1, 2025 · 10:35 am

Synthetic Division (for factorising and/or solving polynomials)

I use synthetic division to factorise polynomials with a degree greater than 2. For example, $f(x)=x^3+2x^2-5x-6$

It works best with monic polynomials but can be adapted to non-monic ones (see example below).

The only problem is that you need to find a root to start.

Try the factors of $-6$ i.e. $(-1, 1, 2, -2, 3, -3, 6, -6)$

$f(-1)=(-1)^3+2(-1)^2-5(-1)-6=0$

Hence, $x=-1$ is a root and $(x+1)$ is a factor of the polynomial.

Set up as follows

Bring the first number down

Multiply by the root and place under the second co-efficient

Add down

Repeat the process

The numbers at the bottom $(1, 1, -6)$ are the coefficients of the polynomial factor.

We now know $x^3+2x^2-5x-6=(x+1)(x^2+x-6)$ .

We can factorise the quadratic in the usual way.

$x^2+x-6=(x+3)(x-2)$

Hence $x^3+2x^2-5x-6=(x+1)(x+3)(x-2)$ .

Let’s try a non-monic example

Factorise $6x^4+39x^3+91x^2+89x+30$

I know $-2$ is a root. Otherwise I would try the factors of 30.

Use synthetic division

Because this was non-monic we need to divide our new co-efficients $(6, 27, 37, 15)$ by 6 (the co-efficient of the $x^4$ term)

$x^3+\frac{9}{2}x^2+\frac{37}{6}+\frac{5}{2}$

We now need to go again. I know that $\frac{-3}{2}$ is a root and $(2x+3)$ is a factor.

Our quadratic factor is $x^2+3x+5/3$ , which is $3x^2+9x+5$ .

The quadratic factor doesn’t have integer factors so,

$6x^4+39x^3+91x^2+89x+30=(x+2)(2x+3)(3x^2+9x+5)$

I think this is much quicker than polynomial long division.

Leave a Comment

Filed under Algebra, Factorising, Factorising, Fractions, Polynomials, Quadratic, Simplifying fractions, Solving Equations

Tagged as non monic synthetic division, Synthetic division

June 26, 2025 · 7:22 am

Trigonometry Question

I don’t know where I found this question, but it does require algebra and problem solving (as well as right trig and Pythagoras)

From a point $A$ , a lighthouse is on a bearing of $026^\circ$ T and the top of the light house is at an angle of elevation of $20.25^\circ$ . From a point $B$ , the lighthouse is on a bearing of $296^\cric$ T and the top of the lighthouse is at angle of elevation of $10.2^\circ$ . If $A$ and $B$ are 500 metres apart, find the height of the lighthouse.

Let’s draw a diagram.

Let the height of the lighthouse be $h$

We can find the angle between $A$ , the lighthouse, and $B$ by using the base triangle

The red line from $L$ is parallel to the two north lines. Hence $\theta=26^\circ+64^\circ=90^\circ$ (Alternate angles in parallel lines are congruent)

It’s a right triangle so we know

(1) $\begin{equation*}500^2=(AL)^2+(BL)^2\end{equation*}$

We are going to use the other two triangles to find $AL$ and $BL$

Substitute $AL$ and $BL$ into equation $1$

$\begin{equation*}500^2=(\frac{h}{tan(20.25)})^2+(\frac{h}{tan(10.2)})^2\end{equation}$

Solve for $h$ .

$\begin{equation*}500^2=7.35h^2+30.89h^2=38.24h^2\end{equation}$

$\begin{equation*}h^2=6538.3\end{equation}$

$\begin{equation*}h=80.9m\end{equation}$

Leave a Comment

Filed under Algebra, Bearings, Pythagoras, Right Trigonometry, Solving Equations, Trigonometry

Tagged as hard trig, trigonometry question

June 19, 2025 · 7:18 am

Converting recurring (non-terminating) decimals to fractions

The easiest approach is to jump right in with some examples.

Example 1

Convert $0.\overline{5}$ to a fraction.

Let $x=0.\overline{5}$

(1) $\begin{equation*}x=0.\overline{5}\end{equation*}$

(2) $\begin{equation*}10x=5.\overline{5}\end{equation*}$

Subtract equation $1$ from equation $2$

$\begin{equation*}9x=5\end{equation}$

Hence $x=\frac{5}{9}$ so $0.\overline{5}=\frac{5}{9}$

Example 2

Convert $0.\overline{12}$ to a fraction.

Let $x=0.\overline{12}$

(3) $\begin{equation*}x=0.\overline{12}\end{equation*}$

(4) $\begin{equation*}100x=12.\overline{12}\end{equation*}$

Subtract equation $3$ from equation $4$ .

$\begin{equation*}99x=12\end{equation}$

$\begin{equation*}x=\frac{12}{99}=\frac{4}{33}\end{equation}$

Example 3

Convert $0.1\overline{23}$ to a fraction

Let $x=0.1\overline{23}$

(5) $\begin{equation*}x=0.1\overline{23}\end{equation*}$

(6) $\begin{equation*}10x=1.\overline{23}\end{equation*}$

(7) $\begin{equation*}1000x=123.\overline{23}\end{equation*}$

Subtract equation $6$ from equation $7$

$\begin{equation*}990x=122\end{equation}$

$\begin{equation*}x=\frac{122}{990}=\frac{61}{495}\end{equation}$

Our aim is to manipulate the recurring decimal to create two numbers each which have only the repeated digits after the decimal point.

One more example.

Example 4

Convert $3.4\overline{56}$ to a fraction

Let $x=3.4\overline{56}$

If I multiply by 10, then I will have $34.\overline{56}$ – only repeated digits after the decimal point.

If I multiply by 1000, then I will have $3456.\overline{56}$ – only repeated digits after the decimal point.

So I get,

$\begin{equation*}990x=3422\end{equation}$

$\begin{equation*}x=\frac{3422}{990}=3\frac{226}{495}\end{equation}$

You can also use your Casio classpad to do the conversion. Although I think it is easier just to do it yourself.

Let’s think about example 4,

$3.4\overline{56}=3.4+\frac{56}{1000}+\frac{56}{100000}+\frac{56}{10000000}+...$

Which is

$3.4+\frac{56}{1000\times 100^0}+\frac{56}{1000\times100^1}+\frac{56}{1000\times 100^2}...$

$3.4+\Sigma_{x=0}^\infty(\frac{56}{1000\times 100^x})$

Leave a Comment

Filed under Arithmetic, Decimals, Fractions, Year 11 Specialist Mathematics

Tagged as recuring decimals to fractions, Year 11 Specialist Mathematics

June 10, 2025 · 1:54 am

Square Root Puzzle

Is it possible to find three numbers, $a, b, c$ , none of which is zero or a perfect square, such that
$\sqrt{a}+\sqrt{b}=\sqrt{c}$

Can You Solve These – David Wells

As $a, b$ and $c$ can’t be perfect squares, let $a=d\times e^2, b=f\times g^2$ and $c=h\times k^2$ where $d, e, f, g, h$ and $k$ are real numbers.

Hence $\sqrt{a}=e\sqrt{d}, \sqrt{b}=g\sqrt{f}$ and $\sqrt{c}=k\sqrt{h}$ .

$\begin{equation*}\sqrt{a}+\sqrt{b}=\sqrt{c}\end{equation}$

$\begin{equation*}e\sqrt{d}+g\sqrt{f}=k\sqrt{h}\end{equation}$

For the above equation to be possible $d, f$ and $h$ must simplify to the same surd. Because we are looking for one set of numbers, let $d=f=h$ .

$\begin{equation*}e\sqrt{d}+g\sqrt{d}=k\sqrt{d}\end{equation}$

$\begin{equation*}e+g=k\end{equation}$

Let’s think of some numbers that might work…

$1+2=3$ or $2+3=5$ , etc.

Let’s try $e=1, g=2,$ and $k=3$

We now have $a=d, b=4d,$ and $c=9d$

As $a$ can’t be a square number, $d$ can’t be a square number.

Try $d=2$

$\begin{equation*}\sqrt{2}+\sqrt{8}=\sqrt{18}\end{equation}$

$LHS=\sqrt{2}+2\sqrt{2}$

$LHS=3\sqrt{2}$

$LHS=\sqrt{9\times 2}$

$LHS=\sqrt{18}$

$LHS=RHS$

One set of possible numbers are $2, 8,$ and $18$ .

Leave a Comment

Filed under Algebra, Interesting Mathematics, Puzzles

June 4, 2025 · 5:30 am

Closest Approach (Shortest Distance) e-activity (Casio Classpad)

At 1pm, object $H$ travelling with constant velocity $\begin{pmatrix}200\\10\end{pmatrix}$ km/h is sighted at the point with position vector $\begin{pmatrix}-90\\-100\end{pmatrix}$ km. At 2pm object $J$ travelling with constant velocity $\begin{pmatrix}100\\-100\end{pmatrix}$ km/h is sighted at the point with position vector $\begin{pmatrix}20\\-120\end{pmatrix}$ km. Determine the minimum distance between $H$ and $J$ and when this occurs.

OT Lee Mathematics Specialist Year 11 Unit 1 and 2 Exercise 10.1 Question 6.

(1) $\begin{equation*}\mathbf{r_H}=\begin{pmatrix}-90\\-100\end{pmatrix}+t\begin{pmatrix}200\\10\end{pmatrix}\end{equation*}$

(2) $\begin{equation*}\mathbf{r_J}=\begin{pmatrix}-80\\-20\end{pmatrix}+t\begin{pmatrix}100\\-100\end{pmatrix}\end{equation*}$

$\begin{pmatrix}-80\\-20\end{pmatrix}$ is the position vector of $J$ at 1pm.

Find the relative displacement of $H$ to $J$

$\begin{equation*}\mathbf{_H}\mathbf{r_J}=\mathbf{r_H}-\mathbf{r_J}\end{equation}$

$\begin{equation*}\mathbf{_H}\mathbf{r_J}=\begin{pmatrix}-90\\-100\end{pmatrix}+t\begin{pmatrix}200\\10\end{pmatrix}-(\begin{pmatrix}-80\\-20\end{pmatrix}+t\begin{pmatrix}100\\-100\end{pmatrix})\end{equation}$

$\begin{equation*}\mathbf{_H}\mathbf{r_J}=\begin{pmatrix}-10\\-80\end{pmatrix}+t\begin{pmatrix}100\\110\end{pmatrix}\end{equation}$

Find the relative velocity of $H$ to $J$

$\begin{equation*}\mathbf{_H}\mathbf{v_J}=\begin{pmatrix}100\\110\end{pmatrix}\end{equation}$

The relative displacement is perpendicular to the relative velocity at the closest approach.

That is

(3) $\begin{equation*}\mathbf{_H}\mathbf{r_J}\cdot\mathbf{_H}\mathbf{v_J}=0\end{equation*}$

$\begin{equation*}(\begin{pmatrix}-10\\-80\end{pmatrix}+t\begin{pmatrix}100\\110\end{pmatrix})\cdot(\begin{pmatrix}100\\110\end{pmatrix})=0\end{equation}$

$\begin{equation*}(-10+100t)(100)+(-80+110t)(110)=0\end{equation}$

$\begin{equation*}-1000+10 000t-8800+12100t=0\end{equation}$

$\begin{equation*}22100t=9800\end{equation}$

$\begin{equation*}t=\frac{98}{221}\end{equation}$

Substitute $t=\frac{98}{221}$ into the relative displacement and find the magnitude.

$\begin{equation*}\mathbf{_H}\mathbf{r_J}=\begin{pmatrix}-10\\-80\end{pmatrix}+\frac{98}{221}\begin{pmatrix}100\\110\end{pmatrix}\end{equation}$

$\begin{equation*}\mathbf{_H}\mathbf{r_J}=\begin{pmatrix}34\frac{76}{221}\\-31\frac{49}{221}\end{pmatrix}\end{equation}$

$\begin{equation*}\|\begin{pmatrix}34\frac{76}{221}\\-31\frac{49}{221}\end{pmatrix}\|=46.4\end{equation}$

The closest objects $H$ and $J$ get to each other is $46.4$ km at 1:27pm.

I have made an e-activity for this.

Leave a Comment

Filed under Classpad Skills, Closest Approach, Vectors, Year 11 Mathematical Methods

Tagged as casio classpad, eactivity, vectors closest approach

May 28, 2025 · 1:33 pm

A Counting Question

How many three digit numbers can you form from the digits 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 if

(a) the digits must occur in increasing order?

(b) adjacent digits differ by 2?

Cambridge Year 11 Specialist Mathematics Skill Sheet 1A

(a) There are $5\times 4\times 3=60$ permutations of three digits from the five digits, but how many of those are in the right order?

Each set of 3 digits has 6 arrangements ( $3\times 2\times 1=6$ ).

For example, if the set is ${1, 2, 3}$ , then the possible arrangements are:

123, 132, 213, 231, 312, and 321.

Only one of those arrangements is in numerical order.

Hence what we want is $\begin{pmatrix}5\\3\end{pmatrix}=10$

(b) I think this one is more about creating a list. I shall start with 1

135, 531, 131, 242, 353, 424, 535, 315

There are 8 possibilities.

Leave a Comment

Filed under Counting Techniques, Year 11 Specialist Mathematics

Tagged as counting techniques, Year 11 Specialist Mathematics

May 24, 2025 · 10:02 am

Circle Geometry Problem

In the diagram, points $A, B, C, D$ and $Q$ lie on a circle centre $O$ , radius $6$ cm and diameter $BQ, \angle{ABQ}=50^\circ, AB$ is parallel to $DO$ and point $P$ lies on diameter $BQ$ such that $OP=DP=4$ cm.

(a) Find $\angle{BCD}$

(b) Determine the length of $PC$ .

$\angle{BOD}=180^\circ-50^\circ=130^\circ$ (Co-interior angles in parallel lines are supplementary.)

$\angle{BCD}=\frac{1}{2}\times 130=65^\circ$ (Angles subtended by the same arc. The angle at the centre is twice the angle at the circumference.)

$\angle{BCD}=65^\circ.$

Let $PC=x$

From the intersecting chord theorem

$\begin{equation*}4\times x=2\times 10\end{equation}$

$\begin{equation*}4x=20\end{equation}$

$\begin{equation*}x=5\end{equation}$

$PC=5cm$

A chord $AB$ of a circle $O$ is extended to $C$ . The straight line bisecting $\angle{OAB}$ meets the circle at $E$ . Let $\angle{BAE}=x$ . Prove that $EB$ bisects $\angle{OBC}$ .

$\angle{BAO}=2x$ ( $AE$ bisects $\angle {BAO}$ )

$\Delta AOB$ is isosceles ( $AO=B0$ radii of the circle)

$\angle{ABO}=2x$ (Equal angles in isosceles triangle)

Therefore $\angle {AOB}=180^\circ-4x$ (angle sum of a triangle)

$\angle {BEA}=90^\circ-2x$ (angle at the circumference is half angle at the centre)

$\angle{ABE}=180^\circ-x-(90^\circ-2x)=90^\circ+x$ (angle sum of a triangle)

$\angle{CBE}=180^\circ-(90^\circ+x)=90^\circ-x$ (angles on a straight line)

$\angle{OBE}=90^\circ+x-2x=90^\circ-x$

$\angle{OBE}=\angle{CBE}$

Hence, $BE$ bisects $\angle{OBC}$

Leave a Comment

Filed under Circle Theorems, Geometry, Uncategorized, Year 11 Specialist Mathematics

Tagged as circle geometry, circle theorems

May 15, 2025 · 10:01 am

Perfect Squares

Find all of the positive integers that make the following expression a perfect square.

(1) $\begin{equation*}(x-10)(x+14)\end{equation*}$

Let

$\begin{equation*}(x-10)(x+14)=n^2\end{equation}$

where $n$ is an integer.

Expand and simplify

$\begin{equation*}x^2+4x-140=n^2\end{equation}$

$\begin{equation*}x^2-4x-n^2=140\end{equation}$

Complete the square

$\begin{equation*}(x+2)^2-4-n^2=140\end{equation}$

$\begin{equation*}(x+2)^2-n^2=144\end{equation}$

Factorise (using difference of perfect squares)

$\begin{equation*}(x+2-n)(x+2+n)=144\end{equation}$

Find all of the factors of $144$

$(1,144), (2, 72), (3, 48), (4, 36), (6, 24), (8, 18), (9, 16), (12, 12)$

First pair,

$\begin{equation*}x+2-n=1 \tag {1} \end{equation}$

$\begin{equation*}x+2+n=144 \tag {2} \end{equation}$

$2x=141$

$x$ must be an integer.

I then used a spreadsheet

Hence the integers that make $(x-10)(x+14)$ are perfect square are, $10, 11, 13, 18,$ and $35$ .

Let’s try another one,

$(x-6)(x+14)$

(2) $\begin{equation*}(x-6)(x+14)=n^2\end{equation*}$

$\begin{equation*}(x^2+8x-84=n^2\end{equation}$

$\begin{equation*}(x+4)^2-n^2=100\end{equation}$

$\begin{equation*}(x+4-n)(x+4+n)=100\end{equation}$

Factors of 100,

$(1, 100), (2, 50), (4, 25), (5, 20), (10, 10)$

So the possible integers are $6$ and $22$ .

Leave a Comment

Filed under Algebra, Arithmetic, Divisibility, Interesting Mathematics, Puzzles, Quadratic, Solving Equations

Tagged as perfect squares

May 6, 2025 · 7:27 am

Combinations Proof

Prove $\begin{pmatrix}n+1\\r\end{pmatrix}=\begin{pmatrix}n\\r-1\end{pmatrix}+\begin{pmatrix}n\\r\end{pmatrix}$

Let’s start with the right hand side.

$RHS=\begin{pmatrix}n\\r-1\end{pmatrix}+\begin{pmatrix}n\\r\end{pmatrix}$

$RHS=\frac{n!}{(n-(r-1))!(r-1)!}+\frac{n!}{(n-r)!r!}$

Simplify

$RHS=\frac{n!}{(n+1-r)!}+\frac{n!}{(n-r)!r!}$

There is a common denominator of $(n+1-r)!r!$

$RHS=\frac{n!}{(n+1-r)!}\times \frac{r}{r}+\frac{n!}{(n-r)!r!}\times \frac{n+1-r}{n+1-r}$

$RHS=\frac{n!r+n!(n+1-r)}{(n+1-r)r!}$

$RHS=\frac{n!r+(n+1)n!-n!r}{(n+1-r)!r!}$

$RHS=\frac{(n+1)!}{(n+1-r)!r!}$

$RHS=\begin{pmatrix}n+1\\r\end{pmatrix}$

$RHS=LHS$

We know this intuitively from Pascal’s triangle

Where each entry is the sum of the two entries above it – for example,

$6+4=10$

Remember, Pascal’s triangle can be written as combinations,

so $\begin{pmatrix}5\\3\end{pmatrix}=\begin{pmatrix}4\\2\end{pmatrix}+\begin{pmatrix}4\\3\end{pmatrix}$

Leave a Comment

Filed under Algebra, Counting Techniques, Year 11 Mathematical Methods

May 3, 2025 · 3:34 am

Geometry Puzzle

Another puzzle from this book

Two ladders are propped up vertically in a narrow passageway between two vertical buildings. The ends of the ladders are 8 metres and 4 metres above the pavement.
Find the height above the ground, $T$ ,